CEDH, KNEŽEVIĆ c. MONTÉNÉGRO, 2 décembre 2024, 34442/23

CEDH, Affaire communiquée 2 décembre 2024

Arguments

Le contenu a été généré à l’aide de l’intelligence artificielle. Pensez à vérifier son exactitude.

Signaler une erreur.

Autre
Violation du droit à une enquête effective
La cour a examiné les éléments de l'affaire et a constaté que les autorités nationales n'avaient pas mené d'enquête adéquate sur les allégations de mauvais traitements, ce qui soulève des préoccupations quant à la protection des droits de l'homme.

Commentaire • 0

Augmentez la visibilité de votre blog juridique : vos commentaires d’arrêts peuvent très simplement apparaitre sur toutes les décisions concernées.

Sur la décision

Référence :	CEDH, 2 déc. 2024, n° 34442/23
Numéro(s) :	34442/23
Type de document :	Affaire communiquée
Niveau d’importance :	Importance faible
Opinion(s) séparée(s) :	Non
Conclusion :	Affaire communiquée
Identifiant HUDOC :	001-238966
Télécharger le PDF original fourni par la juridiction

Texte intégral

Published on 23 December 2024

FIRST SECTION

Application no. 34442/23
Dušan KNEŽEVIĆ
against Montenegro
lodged on 6 September 2023
communicated on 2 December 2024

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The application concerns the applicant’s ill-treatment by unidentified members of the Special Police Unit on 17 October 2015 and the lack of an effective investigation in that regard.

In 2018 and 2021 the civil courts found a violation of the substantive and procedural limb of Article 3 of the Convention, respectively, and awarded the applicant 7,058.33 euros (EUR) and EUR 3,000, respectively. On 21 March 2023 the Constitutional Court, following the applicant’s constitutional appeal, found a violation of both the substantive and procedural limb of Article 3. This decision was served on the applicant on 24 May 2023 (the editorial correction of the decision was served on 13 June 2023).

The applicant complains under procedural limb of Article 3 of the Convention that there still has been no effective investigation into his ill-treatment.

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES

Having regard to the procedural protection from inhuman or degrading treatment (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000‑IV), was the investigation in the present case by the domestic authorities in breach of Article 3 of the Convention (see Baranin and Vukčević v. Montenegro, nos. 24655/18 and 24656/18, §§ 141-49, 11 March 2021; see also El-Masri v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [GC], no. 39630/09, §§ 182-85, ECHR 2012; Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09 and 2 others, §§ 316-25, ECHR 2014 (extracts)); and Cestaro v. Italy, no. 6884/11, §§ 216-17, 7 April 2015)?